Counter-Strike: AM Gaming vs Eternal Fire (BO3) - Super DraculaN Group A

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

AM Gaming and Eternal Fire are set to face off in the Lower bracket quarterfinal 2 of the Super DraculaN Group A, a Counter-Strike 2 match scheduled for 2:00PM ET on June 24. The prediction market currently implies a 100% probability that AM Gaming will win, a stark divergence from Eternal Fire’s recent 40% win rate across their last five matches and their 60% loss rate in the same period[1]. Historical parallels show that such absolute certainty in prediction markets often precedes volatility when a team with a documented losing streak, like Eternal Fire’s 1:2 defeat against AM Gaming in January 2026[2], is involved. In comparable esports contracts, 100% implied probabilities have frequently corrected to 50-50 splits when matches were delayed or ties occurred, as the market penalises overconfidence in the face of tangible underperformance.

Traders should monitor the official match start time and any announcements regarding player availability or technical dependencies that could delay the event beyond the seven-day resolution window. A recent Liquipedia update confirms Eternal Fire’s recent match history, including their January loss to AM Gaming, which underscores the risk of a tie or cancellation if the team struggles with form[2]. The key catalyst is whether Eternal Fire can overcome their 60% loss rate from last month[1], as any delay or incomplete match would reset the market to a 50-50 outcome. Analyst consensus remains cautious, noting that Eternal Fire’s aim-based style, while historically potent, has not translated to recent wins against top-tier opponents like AM Gaming[3]. The market’s 100% YES line appears to ignore these performance metrics, creating a potential divergence for cross-platform odds comparison.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Best Prediction Markets?

Zero. Best Prediction Markets routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.