Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Match Winner | 100% |
| O/U 3.5 Games | 100% |
| Map Handicap: ICE (-1.5) vs Acend (+1.5) | 100% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 100% |
| Map 2 Winner | 100% |
| Map 3 Winner | 100% |
| Map 4 Winner | 100% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 100% |
| Map 5 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 50% |
| Map 4 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 1% |
| O/U 4.5 Games | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ICE (-2.5) vs Acend (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Winner | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 30.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-6.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map 1 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-1.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+1.5) | 0% |
| Map Handicap: ACE (-2.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+2.5) | 0% |
| Map 2 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-3.5) vs Acend (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 24.5 | 0% |
| Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 27.5 | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Acend (-3.5) vs Inner Circle Esports (+3.5) | 0% |
| Map 3 Rounds Handicap: Inner Circle Esports (-6.5) vs Acend (+6.5) | 0% |
Market context
The real-world event is the Counter-Strike 2 Grand Final between Inner Circle Esports and Acend, scheduled for 1:00 PM ET on 28 June as part of the Digital Crusade Super DraculaN Season 1 playoffs. Inner Circle, ranked 42 globally, faces Acend, ranked 59, in a best-of-five match where the winner takes the title and the market resolves to that team[1][3].
Historically, 100% implied probabilities in esports prediction markets often signal either a near-certain outcome or a structural flaw in the contract, such as a mismatched team tier or a cancelled event. Comparable cases from the 2024–2025 Counter-Strike seasons show that when one team is significantly higher ranked and has recent upper-bracket momentum—like Acend’s 1–2 victory over GamerLegion to secure Upper Bracket Semi-Finals—the crowd-implied certainty usually aligns with analyst consensus, though sportsbooks may still offer slight divergence due to liquidity constraints[2][7].
Traders should monitor the official match start confirmation and any delay notices, as the market resolves to 50–50 if the match is not completed within seven days. Acend’s recent comeback performance and their scheduled appearance against Inner Circle tomorrow confirm the match is active, but no official broadcast delay has been announced yet[7]. The settlement window ends 23:30 UTC on 28 June 2026, so any postponement beyond this point would invalidate the current 100% YES probability[4].
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Counter-Strike: Inner Circle Esports vs Acend (BO5) … on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →