Tunisia vs. Netherlands - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

On 25 June 2026 at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City, Tunisia and the Netherlands will meet in their final Group F match of the FIFA World Cup, with the contest resolving after 90 minutes of regulation plus stoppage time. The Netherlands, who have reached three World Cup finals without winning, face a Tunisia side that has lost both prior Group F matches and sits at zero points. Historical head-to-head data shows three previous senior meetings: two draws and no Tunisia wins, including a 2–2 friendly in 1994. Given Tunisia’s current goal deficit of –8 and the Dutch team’s +4 goal difference, the 9% implied probability for an exact score outcome aligns with the pattern of low-scoring, high-variance results in mismatched World Cup fixtures where one team is under severe pressure to revive.

Traders should monitor pre-match line-ups and tactical announcements from both coaches, particularly whether Netherlands manager Ronald Koeman deploys a full-strength attacking line or rotates players after topping the group. Tunisia’s head coach Hervé Renard has hinted at a potential revival, but his side’s defensive frailties remain a key vulnerability. Recent ESPN coverage confirms Tunisia’s 0–0–2 record and the Netherlands’ 1–1–0 standing, with the Dutch favoured at –175 in match odds. A meaningful divergence exists between sportsbook lines, which heavily favour the Netherlands, and the prediction market’s 9% exact score probability, suggesting analysts may be underestimating the chance of a narrow, high-variance result. No major schedule changes are expected, but any injury updates before kick-off at 23:00 UTC could shift the odds significantly.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Best Prediction Markets is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.