Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| O/U 1.5 | 100% |
| Both Teams to Score | 100% |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Mirassol FC O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Grêmio FBPA O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Mirassol FC 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Grêmio FBPA 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 100% |
| Mirassol FC O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Mirassol FC O/U 2.5 | 1% |
| Grêmio FBPA O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Grêmio FBPA O/U 2.5 | 1% |
| Mirassol FC 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Both Teams to Score in Second Half | 1% |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5 | 1% |
| Mirassol FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5 | 1% |
| Mirassol FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Grêmio FBPA 2nd Half O/U 1.5 | 1% |
| Mirassol FC (-1.5) | 0% |
| Grêmio FBPA (-1.5) | 0% |
| Mirassol FC (-2.5) | 0% |
| Grêmio FBPA (-2.5) | 0% |
| O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| O/U 3.5 | 0% |
| O/U 4.5 | 0% |
| O/U 5.5 | 0% |
| Both Teams to Score in First Half | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Grêmio FBPA 1st Half O/U 0.5 | 0% |
| Grêmio FBPA 1st Half O/U 1.5 | 0% |
Market context
Mirassol and Grêmio meet in the Copa do Brasil, with the market for the “more markets” contract settling on the result of the second half and stoppage time rather than the full match. The current crowd-implied probability of **0% YES** is an extreme reading and sits well below the kind of prices usually implied by 90-minute football markets, where even clear underdogs often retain some chance because late-game variance is high. By comparison, the most recent listed sportsbook line for a Mirassol-Grêmio fixture showed Mirassol around **+105** and Grêmio around **-105**, with the draw near **+220**, which points to a broadly even contest rather than a one-sided edge for either side.[17]
The recent head-to-head profile does not support a blanket dismissal of Mirassol: they beat Grêmio **2-1** in Serie A in July 2026, and the teams’ previous two meetings both went Mirassol’s way.[1][3][19] That said, the broader numbers are less clean-cut, with Grêmio carrying the better points total in that league snapshot and the market-implied view for the earlier league meeting placing the side only marginally behind parity.[2][3][17] In practical terms, a zero-per-cent contract price is far more aggressive than the published match odds and the recent results history would justify, so traders should treat it as an outlier unless the settlement language or scope of the “more markets” contract is materially narrower than a standard outright.
For catalysts, the main watch-points are confirmed line-ups, whether either side rotates for fixture congestion, and any late injury or suspension news that changes second-half scoring expectations. The market is also sensitive to the competition context: this contract references a Copa do Brasil game on 2 August at 5:00 PM ET, while the freshest available public match data in the search results is from the teams’ July league meeting, so any divergence between current cup pricing and stale league-era form is likely to matter most if team news materially shifts after those listings were posted.[12][17]
Methodology
We track Mirassol FC vs. Grêmio FBPA - More Markets across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Mirassol FC vs. Grêmio FBPA - More Markets on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →