Germany vs. Côte d'Ivoire - More Markets

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Germany face Côte d’Ivoire in a World Cup group match, and the contract’s 39% YES price sits below the main sportsbook view of Germany as a clear favourite. Oddschecker shows Germany around -180 on the moneyline, with Ivory Coast at +475 and the draw at +340, while another preview lists Germany at roughly -180 with a projected 3-1 scoreline and over 2.5 goals favoured at about -137.[2][1] That gap implies the market is not simply pricing a Germany win; it is pricing the narrower “more markets” bucket as something needing multiple live outcomes to land, which is why the implied probability can sit well under the outright win probability.

For context, comparable pre-match pricing has leaned heavily towards Germany across both bookmaker and analyst framing, but not universally towards the same ancillary markets. A Racing Post preview also made Germany the favourite, yet pointed to a tougher contest and suggested Germany to win with both teams to score, underscoring that the secondary market depends on goals, cards, corners, or similar add-ons rather than just the result.[4] On prediction-market trackers, Germany’s broader tournament profile has remained strong, with DEFI rate citing Germany as a major contender to advance from the group, which supports the idea that this contract is more about match-state volatility than outright team quality.[3]

Traders should watch final team news, because the value in a “more markets” settlement can shift sharply with late changes to starting XIs, keeper selection, or any injury management that affects goal expectation. The main published kick-off time is 4:00 PM ET on 20 June, with other listings showing the match in Toronto, and any discrepancy in market timing or official competition status can matter for settlement if the contract is tied to specific FIFA event metadata rather than the headline fixture alone.[5][4] Recent preview coverage has also clustered around Germany goals, over 2.5 totals, and Germany player props, which means a late move in total-goals pricing would be one of the clearest cross-platform signals to watch.[1][2][5]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Best Prediction Markets triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.