Morocco vs. Haiti - Total Corners

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

The FIFA World Cup Group C match between Morocco and Haiti took place on 24 June at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, with Morocco dominating possession and limiting Haiti’s attacking opportunities. Morocco secured a 3-0 victory, controlling 66.6% of the ball and registering eight shots compared to Haiti’s three, while recording three corners against zero for the Caribbean side[5]. This outcome aligns with pre-match expectations of a low-corner game, as both teams historically trend under double-figure corner counts in World Cup fixtures[1][3].

Historical data from comparable World Cup group-stage matches shows that when one team dominates possession and shot volume, corner totals often remain below 10. Morocco’s average of 3.5 corners per game and Haiti’s four per game support this pattern, with no precedent in their head-to-head record suggesting a surge to double figures[1][4]. The 100% YES crowd-implied probability on the prediction market for “Total Corners” appears to reflect a misinterpretation of the market’s actual threshold, as sportsbooks like Paddy Power priced the match under 9.5 corners at 7-2, indicating a clear divergence from the prediction-market consensus[1].

Traders should monitor official match reports and post-game analytics for any discrepancies in corner counts, particularly given the BBC’s live event tracking which recorded only three corners for Morocco and none for Haiti[5]. Recent previews from SofaScore also noted that Morocco landed under 10.5 corners in five of their last matches, reinforcing the under-trend[3]. With the settlement window closing on 26 June 2026, all data points confirm the corner total remained well below 10, validating the sportsbook line over the prediction-market implication.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Best Prediction Markets triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.