FC Anyang vs. Daejeon Hana Citizen FC - More Markets

Platform comparison

Market context

FC Anyang and Daejeon Hana Citizen meet in a K-League fixture with the related “more markets” contract priced at **0% YES**, which is far below what comparable football data would usually imply for a live match slate. The hard market signal is that bookmakers and model sites still treat this as a normal, wagerable league game rather than a dead market: recent preview material has Daejeon listed as a slight favourite, while other cross-checks point to a fairly even contest with goals on both sides more often than not.[15][16][2]

Historical and comparable results argue against reading a zero price as a football opinion. Recent head-to-head data show a long, balanced rivalry, with FotMob listing 9 Anyang wins, 13 Daejeon wins and 14 draws overall, while another match page says both teams have scored in 8 of the last 9 meetings.[1][2] The most recent league meetings also finished 1-1, and any market built around “more markets” is typically more sensitive to whether the game is postponed, voided, or otherwise fails to generate additional contract-specific outcomes than to the actual win-draw-loss balance on the pitch.[10][13]

The main catalysts to watch are team-news release timing, late lineup changes and any schedule disruption around kick-off, because those are the factors most likely to move a derivative market off zero if the contract depends on the match proceeding normally. On form, Anyang arrive off a 3-1 defeat to Ulsan, while Daejeon followed a 2-0 win over Gwangju, so the underlying football context is still active and recent.[13][16] If no official postponement, abandonment, or contract-rule clarification appears before settlement, the market is likely to remain anchored by the current “no meaningful extra-event” pricing rather than by the competitive balance of the match itself.[15][16]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does Polymarket cost to trade?

Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.