Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| O/U 7.5 | 100% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 3.5 | 100% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 4.5 | 100% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 5.5 | 100% |
| O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| O/U 6.5 | 100% |
| O/U 5.5 | 100% |
| O/U 10.5 | 51% |
| Spread -3.5 | 50% |
| O/U 11.5 | 50% |
| O/U 9.5 | 19% |
| Extra Innings | 16% |
| New York Mets vs. Cleveland Guardians | 12% |
| Spread -1.5 | 4% |
| Spread -1.5 | 4% |
| Spread -2.5 | 3% |
| Spread -2.5 | 3% |
| NRFI | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings Spread -1.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings Spread -1.5 | 0% |
| 1st 5 Innings O/U 6.5 | 0% |
Market context
The New York Mets–Cleveland Guardians game is being priced by sportsbooks as close to a coin flip, while the prediction market’s 12% YES implies a far lower Mets win chance than the betting market consensus. Recent book prices have ranged from Mets slight favourites to Guardians slight favourites: FanDuel had New York around -116 and Cleveland -102, Covers listed Mets -103 and Guardians +100, while FOX’s model-based pricing implied roughly 49% for the Mets and 51% for Cleveland.[3][1][10] That gap matters because a 12% YES looks materially below both the market and most analyst estimates, suggesting the contract is trading well under the wider consensus unless the market is referring to a very specific, outdated, or thinly supported expectation.
Comparable MLB pricing around this matchup has generally clustered in the mid-to-high 40s or low 50s for each side, not in the teens. ESPN’s August 4 final showed Cleveland winning 6-2, and several preview pages for the same series had either team as a narrow favourite depending on the sportsbook and the starting-pitching assumptions.[6][4][5] FanDuel’s research page cited numberFire at 52.5% for a Mets win, while Pickswise showed 51.5% for New York; Action Network and Yahoo’s model-led write-ups leaned the other way towards Cleveland.[3][16][2][4] In other words, analyst consensus was mixed but centred on a competitive game, which makes the current crowd price look unusually pessimistic on the Mets side.
The main catalysts are line-up confirmation, the announced starters, and any schedule changes, because this market stays open if the game is postponed and only settles after completion.[1] MLB probabilities can swing quickly if a late pitcher change or a scratched core bat alters the run line and total, and that is especially relevant here because the market has already seen sizeable movement across books from Guardians-favoured to near pick’em pricing.[2][3][10] Traders should also watch whether the teams carry over bullpen strain from the prior game, since the same matchup produced a 6-2 Guardians result and preview models had already disagreed on total range and side before first pitch.[6][1][4]
Live Data & Statistics
Live stats load when the match begins. Current market odds are shown above. Trading volume: $865K.
Methodology
We track New York Mets vs. Cleveland Guardians across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade New York Mets vs. Cleveland Guardians on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →