Bologna FC 1909 vs. FC Internazionale Milano - More Markets

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Bologna and Inter Milan meet in Serie A on 24 May, with the settlement window closing at 13:00 UTC that day. The fixture represents a late-season encounter in Italy's top division, where both clubs' final standings and European qualification prospects may still be in flux depending on results elsewhere and their own form trajectory.

Historically, Inter Milan holds a significant advantage in head-to-head records against Bologna, winning roughly two-thirds of competitive meetings over the past decade. Bologna's home record at the Stadio Renato Dall'Ara has improved markedly under recent management, though they remain vulnerable to Inter's attacking depth and midfield control. The 57% implied probability on this market—suggesting a roughly even contest with slight lean toward "yes"—sits notably higher than traditional sportsbook lines typically price Inter's win probability in away fixtures against mid-table opposition, where they conventionally trade between 45–52%. This divergence suggests prediction-market participants are pricing in either Bologna's home advantage more heavily or discounting Inter's recent form relative to bookmaker consensus.

Key variables for traders include team news on Inter's injury roster, which historically affects their tactical setup in May fixtures when fixture congestion peaks. Bologna's recent league position and points differential heading into the final matchday will determine whether they play defensively or pursue attacking outcomes. Weather conditions at kick-off and any late-season managerial changes at either club could shift tactical approaches. Monitor official Serie A announcements and club injury bulletins through 23 May for confirmation of squad availability.

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.