Stuttgart Open: Roberto Bautista Agut vs Marcos Giron

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Roberto Bautista Agut and Marcos Giron are scheduled to meet in the Stuttgart Open grass-court tournament on 8 June 2026. The match carries a settlement window extending to 15 June, allowing a seven-day buffer for rescheduling before the market resolves to a 50-50 split. The current 0% implied probability on the YES side (Bautista Agut victory) suggests either extreme confidence in Giron or a liquidity-driven artefact in this particular contract.

Bautista Agut holds a career ATP record against Giron of 2–0, though both encounters occurred on hard courts in 2019 and 2021. Grass-court form diverges significantly from hard-court matchups; Giron has shown modest grass results historically, whilst Bautista Agut reached the Wimbledon quarter-finals in 2019 and maintains a more consistent grass-court record. The 0% reading appears misaligned with conventional sportsbook pricing, which typically reflects Bautista Agut as favourite on grass given his surface experience and head-to-head advantage. Comparable prediction markets on ATP grass events have shown material divergence from traditional odds when liquidity remains thin.

Traders should monitor both players' Stuttgart warm-up performances and any late injury announcements in the week preceding the match. Giron's recent grass-court preparation and seeding status at Stuttgart will signal whether the market's extreme skew reflects genuine form data or simply sparse trading volume. Withdrawal announcements, which occasionally occur at grass tournaments due to surface-specific injury concerns, would trigger the 50-50 resolution clause if either player withdraws without a rescheduled date within seven days.

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on Best Prediction Markets?

Zero. Best Prediction Markets routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.