Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Nikoloz Basilashvili vs Elias Ymer

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Nikoloz Basilashvili’s Wimbledon qualifying match against Elias Ymer is priced very differently across venues, and the contract’s **0% YES** implies the market is effectively treating Basilashvili as a near-impossible winner. That sits well outside the range suggested by betting boards: Flashscore’s listed exchange-style pricing and sportsbook aggregators put Basilashvili in front, with Neo.bet showing him at **1.5** outright and FanDuel carrying the match for an 8:00am ET start[1][2][6]. On those prices, the implied win probability is far from zero, so the prediction market is materially cheaper on Basilashvili than the wider betting market.

Past comparable meetings also matter because they show this is not a clean mismatch. The ATP’s Doha qualifying archive records Ymer beating Basilashvili by retirement in their 2026 meeting, which is a useful reminder that the head-to-head is not one-way, even if the circumstances were unusual[8]. Flashscore currently lists Basilashvili at ATP No. 112 and Ymer at No. 185, which is consistent with Basilashvili being the higher-ranked player but not with a 0% contract price unless traders are assuming some unreported problem with his availability or form[2].

The main catalysts are confirmation of the start time, any late withdrawal news, and whether the qualifying round proceeds on schedule. FanDuel has the match queued for **8:00am ET** on 22 June, while the market description cites **7:30am ET**, so timing differences are already present across platforms[6]. Kalshi’s rule set also makes the settlement path sensitive to whether a ball is actually played, because pre-match cancellation resolves to fair price rather than a straight win-loss outcome[4]. If either player is pulled after line posting but before play, the probability on the contract can move sharply even without a completed result[4].

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). The odds column is filled only where we have clean data — that avoids the made-up numbers that get a network demoted when search engines cross-check against the source venue.

Resolution & payout

Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.

Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Best Prediction Markets is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

How does resolution work?

Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.