Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin | 0% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
Market context
The underlying event is a scheduled match between Antoine Ghibaudo and Ilia Simakin in Istanbul 2, and the market is currently pricing a **0% YES** outcome, which implies the contract is either extremely stale or that traders expect the named player not to advance under the settlement rules. Ghibaudo’s public profile shows a young French player with a career-high ATP singles ranking of **No. 287** in May 2026 and a current ranking in the low 300s, which places him in the Challenger-level tier rather than the main ATP tour.[1][3][14] That sort of ranking profile usually produces fast-moving but not always efficient pricing in lower-tier events, where late withdrawals and draw reshuffles can matter more than headline form.
For context, comparable Challenger and ITF markets often diverge from sportsbook lines because books shade for substitution risk, while prediction markets can overreact to missing confirmation from the draw or order of play. Ghibaudo’s 2026 results are mixed rather than dominant, with records reported around the .500 mark across season and career databases, so a near-zero market price would not align cleanly with his general level if he is indeed on the board to play.[6][11][13] If analyst consensus is leaning towards a live match, the 0% implied probability is the key anomaly; if instead there is no confirmed slot or there has been a late schedule change, the contract may be reflecting resolution risk rather than pure tennis strength.
Traders should watch for three things: official order-of-play updates, any withdrawal notices from the tournament, and whether the match has actually started before the settlement window. These lower-level events are especially sensitive to same-day scheduling changes, and the contract terms also make “not played”, a tie, or a delay beyond seven days from the scheduled date resolve to **50-50**, so calendar movement is as important as the players’ form. With the settlement window ending on 15 August, the immediate catalyst is whether the tournament confirms the fixture and whether either player is replaced or progresses by walkover, retirement, or cancellation.
Methodology
Methodologically we separate two layers: the live probability (Polymarket mid-price) and the platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement currency, payment rails). That keeps the comparison honest — a single canonical probability across the row, with the venue-by-venue trade-offs spelt out in the columns next to it.
Resolution & payout
Polymarket-based markets settle through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon. A proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and unchallenged proposals finalise the resolution. Payouts settle automatically in USDC the moment the result is final — no bookmaker, no delay.
Kalshi-based markets settle in USD via the CFTC-regulated clearinghouse. Betfair Exchange settles in GBP/EUR net of commission. Manifold is play-money and does not pay out real funds.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Istanbul 2: Antoine Ghibaudo vs Ilia Simakin on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →