Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 100% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Match O/U 21.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Match O/U 22.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Match O/U 23.5 | 0% |
| Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Paul Inchauspe’s meeting with Gabriel Debru in Samsun has already been priced by live scoreboards as a straight-up contest, but the market’s **0% YES** implies bettors are effectively assigning no chance to the contract resolving in Inchauspe’s favour. Match trackers place the semi-final on the centre court in Samsun and show the fixture as live or in progress, while the tennis-specific pages still frame Debru as the higher-ranked player in the matchup context and note there is no prior professional head-to-head.[1][3][4]
That makes the current prediction-market line look sharply detached from the broader tennis pricing picture. Comparable pre-match and live feeds around this pairing have not shown anything like a zero-centred outcome for Inchauspe: TennisTemple’s match page lists Debru as the favourite in the market overlay, but the same ecosystem also shows Inchauspe’s live position and sets the encounter at 0-0 at entry, which is the sort of setup where probability can move quickly on the first service breaks.[3] Historical comp data from tennisstats also points to both players arriving with respectable recent win rates, with Debru marginally stronger over the last 12 months, so a hard zero on either side looks more like a contract-specific artefact than a clean tennis read.[4]
Traders should watch the tournament feed and score providers for any changes in status, because the settlement depends on whether the match is actually completed, abandoned, or pushed outside the seven-day window. If play is delayed or suspended, the market’s 50-50 fallback becomes the key risk; if the semi-final finishes normally, the outcome will turn entirely on who advances.[1][12] The main catalysts are therefore simple but important: official scheduling updates from Samsun, any retirement or walkover notice, and whether the live scoreboard continues to register active play rather than a cancellation or unfinished state.[1][6][12]
Methodology
We track Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What does Polymarket cost to trade?
- Polymarket itself charges 0% — the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction. Off-chain venues like Kalshi or Betfair charge 2-7% commission.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Samsun: Paul Inchauspe vs Gabriel Debru on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →