🎁 New traders: 100% Deposit Match up to $500 · 0% fees · instant USDC payoutsClaim it →
Skip to main content
HomeGuideCryptoMarketsBlogGet started →

Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing

Five-platform snapshot of "Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing" — live Polymarket pricing, plus how Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold structure the same contract.

0% YES 100% NO Volume: $143K Closes: 29 Jun 2026
Trade on Best Prediction Markets →
Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing

Platform comparison

PlatformYES oddsNO oddsFeeKYCSettlement
Best Prediction Markets Pick
polygram.ink
0% 100% 0% (USDC on-chain) No-KYC up to $1,500 USDC, auto via UMA oracle Open on Best Prediction Markets →
Polymarket
polymarket.com
0% 100% 0% Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU USDC, on-chain Open on Best Prediction Markets →
Kalshi
kalshi.com
Up to 7% per trade US-only, KYC required USD Open on Best Prediction Markets →
Betfair Exchange
betfair.com
2-5% commission Full KYC from first trade GBP / EUR Open on Best Prediction Markets →
Manifold Markets
manifold.markets
Play-money (mana) None — play-money Mana (no cash-out) Open on Best Prediction Markets →

Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Best Prediction Markets.

Active sub-markets

Market context

Francesco Maestrelli’s Wimbledon qualifying match with Max Basing is live on the board, but the contract’s **0% YES** crowd price signals an expectation that the outcome is already effectively decided, or that the market is pricing in non-completion rather than a straightforward tennis result. That sits in sharp contrast to the usual sportsbook framing for a first-round qualifying match, where the line is generally expressed as a normal head-to-head contest rather than an event with almost no chance of a YES settlement. Tennis Stats lists the pair as having equal career wins and shows the next match at 3:30pm on 22 June 2026, while Tennis.com also has the qualifying-round fixture on its Wimbledon schedule.[1][6]

For historical context, markets at 0% are usually only justified when the exchange believes the named outcome is blocked by a procedural issue, withdrawal, or a timing problem, not because one player is modestly favoured. That matters here because Wimbledon qualifying can still be affected by late scratches, walkovers, or rain, and prediction-market rules can differ from sportsbook grading rules when a match is not completed. Robinhood’s own tennis market language shows how cancellation and postponement rules can drive settlement away from a simple win/loss outcome, which is relevant when comparing this contract to standard bookmaker odds.[2] The ATP head-to-head page confirms this is an official tour-level meeting, but not one with an established rivalry history that would normally justify a hard one-sided price.[7]

Traders should watch for official draw updates, late injury news, and any schedule slippage at Roehampton, because a delayed start or a withdrawal before first serve is the main route to a non-standard settlement. Sportsbooks including DraftKings and FanDuel are carrying the match in their Wimbledon markets, so any meaningful move there would be a useful cross-check against the 0% prediction-market print.[4][5] If the match starts on time, the contract should become much more sensitive to live score updates and retirement risk; if it is postponed beyond the market’s settlement window, the 50-50 fallback becomes the key path to resolution rather than a normal player advance.[2]

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.

On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
How does resolution work?
Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
What does it cost to trade on Best Prediction Markets?
Zero. Best Prediction Markets routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.
How reliable are the quoted odds?
The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
and

Trade Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli v… on Best Prediction Markets

Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.

Trade on Best Prediction Markets →

Related Topics

Tennis Prediction Markets