Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Prediction Markets Pick polygram.ink |
0% | 100% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Polymarket polymarket.com |
0% | 100% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Best Prediction Markets.
Active sub-markets
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing | 0% Francesco Maestrelli | 100% Max Basing |
| Completed Match | 100% YES | 0% NO |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli vs Max Basing Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% Maestrelli | 100% Basing |
Market context
Francesco Maestrelli’s Wimbledon qualifying match with Max Basing is live on the board, but the contract’s **0% YES** crowd price signals an expectation that the outcome is already effectively decided, or that the market is pricing in non-completion rather than a straightforward tennis result. That sits in sharp contrast to the usual sportsbook framing for a first-round qualifying match, where the line is generally expressed as a normal head-to-head contest rather than an event with almost no chance of a YES settlement. Tennis Stats lists the pair as having equal career wins and shows the next match at 3:30pm on 22 June 2026, while Tennis.com also has the qualifying-round fixture on its Wimbledon schedule.[1][6]
For historical context, markets at 0% are usually only justified when the exchange believes the named outcome is blocked by a procedural issue, withdrawal, or a timing problem, not because one player is modestly favoured. That matters here because Wimbledon qualifying can still be affected by late scratches, walkovers, or rain, and prediction-market rules can differ from sportsbook grading rules when a match is not completed. Robinhood’s own tennis market language shows how cancellation and postponement rules can drive settlement away from a simple win/loss outcome, which is relevant when comparing this contract to standard bookmaker odds.[2] The ATP head-to-head page confirms this is an official tour-level meeting, but not one with an established rivalry history that would normally justify a hard one-sided price.[7]
Traders should watch for official draw updates, late injury news, and any schedule slippage at Roehampton, because a delayed start or a withdrawal before first serve is the main route to a non-standard settlement. Sportsbooks including DraftKings and FanDuel are carrying the match in their Wimbledon markets, so any meaningful move there would be a useful cross-check against the 0% prediction-market print.[4][5] If the match starts on time, the contract should become much more sensitive to live score updates and retirement risk; if it is postponed beyond the market’s settlement window, the 50-50 fallback becomes the key path to resolution rather than a normal player advance.[2]
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- On Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does it cost to trade on Best Prediction Markets?
- Zero. Best Prediction Markets routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Francesco Maestrelli v… on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Trade on Best Prediction Markets →