Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best Prediction Markets Pick polygram.ink |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Polymarket polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Open on Best Prediction Markets → |
Live odds for Polymarket-based markets come from the Polygon order book. Non-Polymarket venues show attributes only; clicking any row opens the market on Best Prediction Markets.
Active sub-markets
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs Felipe Meligeni Alves | 100% Mackenzie McDonald | 0% Felipe Meligeni Alves |
| Completed Match | 100% YES | 0% NO |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs Felipe Meligeni Alves Match O/U 23.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs Felipe Meligeni Alves Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 0% Over | 100% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs Felipe Meligeni Alves Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% Over | 0% Under |
| Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs Felipe Meligeni Alves Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% Over | 100% Under |
Market context
Mackenzie McDonald and Felipe Meligeni Alves are due to meet in Wimbledon qualifying, with the official order of play listing their match on Court 2 at 11:00am local time in the qualifying draw. The prediction market is pricing a 100% YES outcome for McDonald, which is an unusually absolute signal for a single tennis match and suggests the contract is being treated as effectively one-sided rather than genuinely uncertain. The broader market read also leans McDonald’s way: Robinhood’s related game-spread contract shows McDonald priced at 31¢ on -5.5 games and 30¢ on -8.5 games, while -2.5 games is marked at 0¢, indicating the platform sees a meaningful favourite but not necessarily a clean sweep on every line.[2][9]
That is a useful reminder that certainty in one market does not always translate across the board. Sportsbooks and data-led previews have framed the contest as a standard qualifying-round matchup rather than a mismatch, with Tennis.com and other live-score services treating it as a scheduled first-round qualifying fixture and Sportskeeda publishing a match preview rather than an upset-special.[1][5][6] In practical terms, traders should separate outright winner risk from settlement risk: if the match is moved, interrupted, or not completed within the market’s seven-day window, the contract can resolve 50-50 regardless of the in-play shape.[9]
The main catalysts are therefore administrative rather than narrative: final court assignment, start-time changes, and whether Wimbledon’s qualifying schedule is held up by weather or backlog. Because qualifying matches are often queued tightly on the early grass-court schedule, any delay can matter more to this contract than pre-match form, especially with the settlement window running to 29 June 2026. If the published order of play stands and the match is completed normally, the market’s 100% YES price will be tested immediately against the live result rather than any pre-event consensus.[9][6]
Methodology
We track Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs Felipe Meligeni Alves on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Best Prediction Markets is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- What does it cost to trade on Best Prediction Markets?
- Zero. Best Prediction Markets routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Best Prediction Markets triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.
Trade Wimbledon, Qualification ATP: Mackenzie McDonald vs … on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Trade on Best Prediction Markets →