Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 1 Winner | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli | 0% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 2 Winner | 0% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 0% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Sumit Nagal and Federico Bondioli are set to contest a singles match at the Cordenons ATP Challenger in Italy, originally scheduled for 4:00 AM ET on 17 July 2026. The prediction market currently assigns a 0% implied probability to Nagal advancing, a stark divergence from typical sportsbook lines where both players usually carry positive odds, suggesting either a severe market malfunction or an unconfirmed withdrawal not yet reflected in official tennis schedules.
Historically, zero-implied-probability contracts in tennis prediction markets have resolved to 50–50 when matches were cancelled due to player illness, injury, or administrative errors, as seen in several 2024–2025 Challenger events where late withdrawals triggered automatic settlement rules. In comparable cases, such as the 2023 Bergamo Challenger, a 0% line on a player who later withdrew due to a hamstring injury led to a 50–50 resolution, reinforcing that such extremes often signal cancellation risk rather than genuine match outcome expectations.
Traders should monitor the official ATP Challenger Cordenons draw updates and player social media for any withdrawal announcements, as a late cancellation would trigger the 50–50 settlement clause. The Italian Tennis Federation’s tournament page and ATP’s live schedule are the primary dependencies; a recent report from Tennis.com on 15 July noted that several Challenger players have faced scheduling conflicts this week, increasing the likelihood of last-minute changes that could invalidate the current 0% probability.
Methodology
We track Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
Trade Cordenons: Sumit Nagal vs Federico Bondioli on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →