Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| 1. FC Cologne 2 - 0 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 100% |
| 1. FC Cologne 0 - 3 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 1% |
| 1. FC Cologne 2 - 3 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 1% |
| 1. FC Cologne 0 - 0 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 0 - 1 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 1 - 0 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 0 - 2 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 1 - 1 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 1 - 2 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 2 - 1 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 3 - 0 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 1 - 3 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 2 - 2 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 3 - 1 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 3 - 2 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| 1. FC Cologne 3 - 3 Real Sociedad San Sebastian | 0% |
| Any Other Score | 0% |
Market context
1. FC Köln and Real Sociedad meet in a club friendly, and the contract is priced as if an exact scoreline is overwhelmingly unlikely: the crowd-implied probability at 0% YES means the market is effectively saying no listed scoreline has a meaningful chance on current information. That is not the same as a literal zero on the pitch; it usually reflects thin liquidity and the wide spread of possible friendly outcomes, especially where line-ups, match length and substitutions can change the scoring profile late in the day. Cross-platform, the contrast is stark: sportsbook-style listings and fixture pages show the game as a standard pre-season meeting, while prediction-market pricing is far more compressed around “Any Other Score” than around any single exact result.[3][6][10]
Historical and comparable cases point in the same direction. The clubs have only limited recorded competitive history, with UEFA’s head-to-head page showing just one win each and one draw across their official meetings, including Real Sociedad’s 1-0 home win in 1988/89.[4] That kind of sparse, low-signal head-to-head record is of limited use for exact-score modelling, but it does show there is no entrenched score pattern to anchor a single outcome. Recent form from comparable summer fixtures is more informative: both sides have produced mixed, high-variance results in late-season and friendly environments, which typically pushes exact-score markets towards a broad distribution rather than a favourite scoreline.[6][12][14]
The main catalysts to watch are team news, kick-off confirmation and whether either club treats the fixture as a full-strength rehearsal or a rotated fitness run-out. Any late announcement of squad absences, youth-heavy line-ups or a shortened format would reduce the appeal of conventional score patterns and can move the contract towards “Any Other Score” even further; conversely, a confirmed stronger XI can make 1-0, 1-1 or 2-1 scorelines marginally more plausible than the market currently implies. Because the settlement window closes the same day as the match, the decisive information is likely to come from official pre-match team sheets and trusted live match feeds rather than long-range analyst consensus, which remains inherently limited for exact-score contracts in friendlies.[3][6][16]
Methodology
This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote, four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to Best Prediction Markets, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.
Resolution & payout
At resolution the UMA oracle takes over: a proposer posts the outcome with a bond, any token holder can dispute within two hours. Without dispute the result is accepted and the smart contract distributes USDC instantly.
On Kalshi (CFTC-regulated) resolution runs through their in-house clearing engine in USD. Betfair Exchange settles after match end in the account's local currency. Manifold pays no cash — only its in-platform "mana" currency.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- How does resolution work?
- Through the UMA Optimistic Oracle on Polygon: a proposer submits the outcome, a two-hour challenge window opens, and USDC payouts settle automatically once the result is final.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
- How reliable are the quoted odds?
- The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.
Trade 1. FC Cologne vs. Real Sociedad San Sebastian - Exac… on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →