Platform comparison
| Platform | YES odds | NO odds | Fee | KYC | Settlement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymarket (via Best Prediction Markets) Pick polygram.ink (preferred broker) |
100% | 0% | 0% (USDC on-chain) | No-KYC up to $1,500 | USDC, auto via UMA oracle | Live odds → |
Polymarket (direct) polymarket.com |
100% | 0% | 0% | Geo-blocked in US/UK/EU | USDC, on-chain | Live odds → |
Kalshi kalshi.com |
— | — | Up to 7% per trade | US-only, KYC required | USD | Live odds → |
Betfair Exchange betfair.com |
— | — | 2-5% commission | Full KYC from first trade | GBP / EUR | Live odds → |
Manifold Markets manifold.markets |
— | — | Play-money (mana) | None — play-money | Mana (no cash-out) | Live odds → |
Outcome probabilities
Current market-implied probability for each outcome, from the live order book.
| Outcome | Probability |
|---|---|
| Completed Match | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 Winner | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 O/U 8.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Match O/U 21.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Total Sets: O/U 2.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Match O/U 22.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 O/U 9.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Match O/U 23.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 O/U 10.5 | 100% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas | 0% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 1 Winner | 0% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 O/U 9.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set Handicap +/-1.5 | 0% |
| Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas Set 2 O/U 10.5 | 0% |
Market context
Rei Sakamoto’s quarter-final against Edas Butvilas in Lexington is being priced very differently across markets: the prediction market sits at **0% YES**, while sportsbooks are much closer to a coin-flip, with one listed moneyline making Sakamoto a modest favourite at -141 and Butvilas +111, and another odds board showing average prices around 1.72 for Sakamoto and 1.74 for Butvilas. That gap matters because the contract resolves on a binary advance/win condition, so a near-even tennis line can still look “dead” on a thin prediction-market book if liquidity is low or no one has updated after late information. Tennis Temple also lists Sakamoto higher in the ATP rankings, 162 live against Butvilas at 261, which is broadly consistent with the slight sportsbook lean towards Sakamoto.[2][8][13]
Historical framing points to a market that should not be read as a pure match-strength forecast. Challenger-level quarter-finals often move on surface fit, recent workload and draw context rather than ranking alone, and Tennis Tonic’s preview has Sakamoto as the pick, even projecting a three-set match, while other odds screens show only small separation between the players.[10][13] Tennis Explorer’s aggregate pricing is similarly tight, with average odds of 1.72 and 1.74, reinforcing that the underlying contest is competitive rather than one-sided.[13]
For traders, the main catalysts are timing and completion risk, not just who is better on paper. The match was listed for Stadium 2 on 7 August, but official live pages still showed it as upcoming, so any delay, walkover, cancellation or suspension could matter more than pre-match form because the contract explicitly settles 50-50 if the match is not played, tied, or delayed beyond seven days without a winner.[3][11] With the settlement window running to 14 August, any rescheduling, retirement or bracket change around Lexington’s quarter-finals could be decisive, especially if the event schedule slips after the original start time.[2][3]
Methodology
We track Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas across the five venues with material prediction-market liquidity. The probability shown is the live Polymarket mid; the comparison rows summarise how each venue treats the underlying contract — fees, KYC thresholds, settlement currency, deposit options. The highlighted row marks the cheapest route into Polymarket's order book.
Resolution & payout
Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.
Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.
FAQ
- Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?
- Polymarket is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. The easiest 0%-fee broker into the same order book is Best Prediction Markets. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.
- Is this market available outside the US?
- Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check the legal status of prediction markets in your jurisdiction before trading.
- What's the difference between YES and NO shares?
- A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.
- How fast are USDC deposits?
- Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.
- Do I need to KYC for this market?
- On Polymarket directly, no — it's wallet-based. Intermediary brokers like Best Prediction Markets trigger KYC only above $1,500 of lifetime trading volume; under that you trade pseudonymously with a single wallet address.
Trade Lexington: Rei Sakamoto vs Edas Butvilas on Best Prediction Markets
Live order book, 0% fees, USDC settlement in seconds.
Open live market →